<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What The &quot;Significant Objects Project&quot; Can Teach Us About Law Firm Marketing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.attorneysync.com/blog/2010/01/what-the-significant-objects-project-can-teach-us-about-law-firm-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.attorneysync.com/blog/what-the-significant-objects-project-can-teach-us-about-law-firm-marketing/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-the-significant-objects-project-can-teach-us-about-law-firm-marketing</link>
	<description>Attorney SEO, Web Design, Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 20:00:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.attorneysync.com/blog/what-the-significant-objects-project-can-teach-us-about-law-firm-marketing/#comment-6689</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lawyermarketing.attorneysync.com/?p=3012#comment-6689</guid>
		<description>I found the use of my image in this context, to be in direct contradiction of the description and purpose of the creation of this image.

The view that an object should be given greater value because it is coveted by someone, is NOT the point of the Concept of satisfaction with what we have because it&#039;s VALUE has no importance.

And don&#039;t get me started about the &quot;volunteer writers whip up fictional back stories &quot;. this is out and out lies and deception. What sort of ethics could someone who encourages misrepresentation when selling things have?
White_Guardian_Angel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found the use of my image in this context, to be in direct contradiction of the description and purpose of the creation of this image.</p>
<p>The view that an object should be given greater value because it is coveted by someone, is NOT the point of the Concept of satisfaction with what we have because it&#8217;s VALUE has no importance.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t get me started about the &#8220;volunteer writers whip up fictional back stories &#8221;. this is out and out lies and deception. What sort of ethics could someone who encourages misrepresentation when selling things have?<br />
White_Guardian_Angel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

