When you think about SEO, what comes to mind? Spam? Tricking Google? Keywords? Links?
What about index status? Crawl errors? Crawl stats? Pages speed?
Not nearly as many SEOs seems to be talking about technical SEO as are talking about the more mainstream "marketing SEO."
I'm not here to to diminish the importance of what I'm calling "marketing SEO" (i.e. creating great pages and getting them in front of people who are ready, willing and able to link to, share and otherwise publicize them).
But I do think a lot of folks are missing out on some great opportunities to improve site performance in search. And this is particularly true for legal websites and blogs.
The image at the top of this post is from a Google Webmaster Tools (GWMT) Search Queries report. If you're not spending time in GWMT and Bing Webmaster Tools (BWMT), you're really missing out.
The image shows changes in impressions, clicks, click-through-rates (CTR) and avg. positions for select target search queries for about the last 30 days.
Admittedly, these numbers aren't huge. But the change, the immediacy of the change and the business impact from this change, is what matters here.
You might be thinking, "this site obviously earned a bunch of new links during this time frame."
You'd be wrong. No new links.
The changes were all of a technical nature.
Improved speed. Improved design. Fixing 404 errors. Making changes to XML sitemap. Making changes to robots.txt. Making changes to robots meta tags.
The list goes on...
So why are these problems so common, especially when it comes to law firm websites and blogs?
There are a variety of reasons.
In an effort to keep costs down, many lawyers build their own sites (or have their nephews build them). But the do-it-yourself'ers don't make up the majority of sites that I encounter with these issues.
They're sites built by companies who selling law firm website and blogs!
And sometimes, for tens of thousands of dollars!
There's no doubt that in some of these cases, the people building these sites know better. That's just malicious.
But in many more instances, the issue is one of negligence.
You see, many web designers and developers learned their craft in the age before, or during the transition period of, the age of search engines.
They built websites without regard to how they would perform in search.
They're main goal was to make them "look good" (a goal that was often not met I might add).
Fortunately, as the worlds of search engine optimization and website design and development become more intertwined, we see less of this with newer websites.
If you are a do-it-yourself'er when it comes to your firm's website and online marketing, and you want to improve the technical SEO aspects of your sites, start with Google Webmaster Tools Help. You should also check out The Short Cutts, the short answers to every Matt Cuttts Video. If you don't already know, Cutts is Google's head of web spam.
Of course, if you're unsure whether or not your sites/blogs have technical SEO issues, and have absolutely no desire to learn about this stuff, we're happy to pop-the-hood.
If you have specific questions about your site (and you're willing to ask / share publicly) feel free to ask them in the comments below.
Over the years, law firm prospects have sent us reports from just about all of our competitors. Unfortunately, even today, some law firm marketing agencies still mislead their clients via "reporting." One particularly egregious example comes in the form of ranking reports. Which prompted this LinkedIn post. To my surprise, I received a lot of […]
John Wanamaker supposedly said "Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don't know which half." In an an effort to figure out "what half is working," attribution was born. Coupled with a transition from traditional, offline ads to digital media, attribution became the holy grail for analyzing advertising spends. But […]
I recently asked ChatGPT, "What are some of the top personal injury law firms in Chicago?? Actually, first I ask "who are some of the top personal injury lawyers in Chicago?" ChatGPT couldn't handle that one, so I modified the prompt. ChatGPT listed five very well-known firms downtown. Can you guess the other four? That's […]
If you're like me, you have some degree of AI, ChatGBT, Bard, exhaustion. Now don't get me wrong, this is stuff is remarkable and is changing, well, a lot. But before you hook up the ChatGPT API to your WordPress API and crank out 10,000 pages, here are a few things to think about. Let's […]
If you know me, you know my opinions about links and SEO advice from Google. If you don't, here's the TL;DR: Meh, links! Meaning, all things being equal, links still remain a competitive difference maker for ranking. Take Google's SEO advice with several grains of salt. Google has no economic incentive to help your site […]
The best marketing advice I can give you is to be authentic. Of course, you don't find that very helpful in terms of meeting your growth goals. So, you might decide to game the system. As I'm writing this, one of the more popular ways to gain the system is to pay for engagement. This […]
The following post was written by ChatGPT. ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, is a state-of-the-art language model that can generate human-like text based on a given prompt or context. This technology has the potential to revolutionize the way that businesses, including law firms, market themselves to potential clients. One way that a law firm could use […]
How long does SEO take? When can I expect to see results? What results should I expect to see? These are all reasonable questions that we field from lawyers every day. And, like many legal answers, the answer is: It depends. Yes, I know that's not the answer you wanted. But it's the most honest […]
And how much time should they spend doing it? I recently had the privilege of chatting with Tyson, Jim, and Conrad for an upcoming episode of The Maximum Lawyer Podcast. If you're not familiar with The Maximum Lawyer community, you should definitely check it out. Jim asked a really great question about who should do […]
