It seems pretty straightforward: Rank highly in search engines, people contact you and sometimes hire you.
Which leads lawyers to hyper-focus on their rankings. I've previously posted about why spot-checking rankings and obsessing over ranking reports are largely a waste of time.
It's not that rankings don't matter. Of course they do. It's just that rankings ≠ traffic ≠ inquiries ≠ clients.
One of the major problems with hyper-focusing on specific rankings on a daily basis is the accuracy of ranking reporting tools. Here's a recent example for our website.
Query: SEO for Atorneys
Raven (Avg. Position GWMT): 10.3
AWR with Proxy Server: Previously 8, Not Found
Moz: 6
SE Scout: 8
And here's a spot check:
What's the deal?
It's important to recognize what causes these differences.
First is SERP flux. The results, especially recently, fluctuate a lot. So, depending on when the tool takes its "snapshot" of results, it's likely that you'll see differences.
Second is the way the tools take their snapshot. The very nature of scraping results lends itself to potential differences depending on how the results are being scraped (think IP addresses, local results, universal results).
Finally, it's worth noting that GWMT average position isn't even a scraped result. It's calculated in an entirely different way. So it's really apples and oranges.
The bottom line is that each of these rank data sets is worth consideration. But if you hyper-focus and regularly spot-check ranking reports, you'll drive yourself (and your SEO) insane.
On the other hand, if you monitor general trends, and tie them to strategic and tactical decisions, rankings can be used as a general guidepost. Especially for terms that you're tying to traffic, inquiries and new business.
Which brings us to the main point: Use rankings to inform, but not as goals in and of themselves.
After all, rankings don't pay the rent, clients do.
On April 22, 2025, Google sent an email updating Local Services Ads Additional Terms for Providers: Subject: Action required: important updates to Local Service Ads Additional Terms Many people are arguing that lawyers cannot participate in Local Services Ads, as this would constitute a per se violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct related to […]
Conrad and I recently joined Zack at Lawyerist to record a conversation about AI and marketing. You might think that we spend the whole time on how lawyers can use AI to publish content. You'd be wrong. While AI can certainly support publishing, there are many more interesting ways to use it in legal marketing. […]
As more legal services consumers turn to ChatGPT for local law firm recommendations, a fascinating intersection between AI, search, and maps unfolds. While Google remains the undisputed leader in local business data, ChatGPT is increasingly becoming an entry point for searchers seeking legal representation. But here’s the kicker: instead of keeping users within its ecosystem, […]
When law firms contact us, they usually want to talk: • PPC Ads • SEO Rankings • Lead Generation Very few want to talk: • Brand • Trust & Recognition • Emotional Connection Admittedly, much of this concerns that AttorneySync is known for lead generation across those common digital channels. But even when we start […]
According to an October 2024 study by SE Ranking: "The legal niche triggers the highest percentage of AIOs (77.67%). The average number of links matched between the AI Overview resources and the top 20 search results was 6.49 for legal topics. AI Overviews for legal topics most frequently link to NYCourts.gov (114 links), YouTube.com (48 […]
I'm grateful for my friend, Charley Mann of Law firm Alchemy. If you're a lawyer, subscribe to his Free Email List. In a recent email, Charley calls out bad guru advice on hiring: "Trying to execute a major SEO improvement? You need to find people who will help you, instead of trying to DIY it […]
If you’ve spent any time on LinkedIn, you’ve likely seen posts from law firm SEO experts showing off charts with an “up and to the right” trajectory. These screenshots, often pulled from tools like Semrush or Ahrefs, are meant to signal SEO success. And it’s not just the agencies celebrating—𝗹𝗮𝘄 𝗳𝗶𝗿𝗺𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 […]
Meh, links! All things being equal, links still tend to move the dial more than any other factor in legal SERPs. Maybe links are having a diminishing impact internet-wide. But in my experience, quality links, especially relevant links (both topically and geographically), tend to improve law firm visibility in search more than most everything else. […]
When you think of "marketing," what's the first thing that comes to mind? Ads? SEO? Social Media? What about: Helping others?Taking the lead? Rallying around your community? Need an example? Learn from Bart Siniard at Siniard Law Injury Attorneys efforts to help rebuild Mary's Pit BBQ. These efforts aren't about marketing. They're about supporting a […]
Rankings are indicators not goals. Couldn't agree more.
While the complexity "rankings" is somewhat frustrating, I do see it as job security for those of us who know better than to rely on a tool. The hard part is getting the client to understand and appreciate (i.e. pay for it).
Hey Bill, thanks for stopping by. Yep, exactly. It's really tough to move some folks off of "rankanoia."
In the Army, it was called R.H.I.P. (rank has its privileges) Old school SEO is heavy on the ranking bit, and while pg1 ranking is a major goal, it doesn't pay the rent. Whereas, video views that leads to a subscriber and maybe a share of your video doesn't pay the rent either, but more valuable to most.
I recently connected my YT channel to the SumAll platform to have a handy path to see my top socials by user engagement and it looks promising.
I'm always fascinated by how much money folks spend to get those perceived "top rankings" and then to see the traffic that's actually generated for those handful of terms versus "everything else."