Here's an issue that surfaces from time to time, particularly in the legal web marketing sphere:
I have a website and content management system that I am happy with. However, I donโt have anything to compare them to and I wonder if there might be a comparable product for a lower price or a better product for what I am paying now. I pay $750/month, which allows me to easily make changes to the site and add blogs, articles, news, etc. It also has tracking capabilities for people who call the 800 number or fill out a contact form. It can also be customized to send automatic follow-up emails. From time to time the company also provides free upgrades to the website to make it perform and look better. There may be other benefits that Iโm just not aware of too. Any insight you may have would be appreciated. Thanks.
Let's deconstruct some of the questions and issues.
There's a world of difference between a content management system, website administration and website marketing.
A web content management system (CMS) is merely an application that lets publish, edit and organize your web content. Some content management systems are open source, or otherwise free to use. Others are proprietary, meaning you typically pay a licensing fee to use the software. Examples of popular open source content management systems are WordPress, Joomla and Drupal.
A CMS is merely the platform upon which your web content is built. It's just the tool. A CMS is not equal to website administration.
Website administration might include all of the "stuff" that goes into creating and maintaining a website. This might include adding blog posts, articles and firm news. It also might include installation and maintenance of tracking systems like Google Analytics, goal tracking, web form tracking and call tracking.
It's important to note that website administration really isn't website marketing. While there might be some limited overlap, you shouldn't confuse the administration of your site with the marketing of your site.
Website marketing includes all of the "stuff" you do to communicate the value of your services, earn meaningful attention to your site(s) and motivate visitors to contact and hire you.
As you can see, these are very different things.
In the example above, it seems that the lawyer is paying $750/month for the CMS, phone and form fill tracking and an autoresponder. The lawyer alludes to the fact that there might be other benefits of which he's unaware. I make no judgment on the particulars of this particular offering. However, for just these features, I'd offer the following alternatives.
For content management, I recommend WordPress. It's open source and free to use. It's rare that I see a law firm business case for using a CMS other than WordPress. If you're not particularly tech-savvy, you can (and probably should) have someone install and configure WordPress. You'll also have to choose between a free, premium and completely custom theme. For a premium theme, you should probably expect to pay between $30 and $100 for a one-time license. For a custom theme, you should probably expect to spend upwards of $3,000 for design and a bit more for development (prices vary greatly). In my experience, for quality design and development, you're probably closer to the $7,000+ range.
For form fills and form fill tracking, you could use the Contact Form 7 WordPress plugin and configure a goal in Google Analytics. Again, this is completely free. If you can't implement this yourself, you can probably hire a freelancer to set it up. Gravity and Wufoo are other web form solutions worth looking into.
For phone call tracking, there are a variety of options with some serious considerations, especially as they relate to local search. You should read this post on call tracking and local search at Mike Blumenthals blog. Nonetheless, you can use something like Call Rail to get this done for upwards of $30 per month depending on how much traffic you get.
For email autoresponders, check out Mailchimp and Aweber. Both less than $50 per month for most lawyers' needs.
You should also consider Avvo's Ignite product (lead tracking, autoresponder and lead CRM). Not sure what the current pricing looks like. But it can be a pretty great solution.
For merely CMS, email / call tracking and autoresponder, $750 per month seems excessive. However, if this fee includes theme design and development, hours of monthly administration time and marketing, then it's a steal. It really just depends upon what the complete picture looks like.
The problem that we regularly encounter is that lawyers "know the need a web presence," but don't really know what that means. Merely having a website built is not the same as winning new clients from the web.
The key is to understand exactly what you're paying for and what it's supposed to do. Set very specific goals for your web presence. Understand the differences between "being online" and being online in a way that has value to your practice in a way that is profitable. They're not the same thing...
Hope this clears things up to some extent.
Here's a recent Google SERP for "๐๐ต๐ผ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐น๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฝ๐ต๐ถ๐น๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น๐ฝ๐ต๐ถ๐ฎ." Ads? โLSAs? โLocal Pack? โLinks? โ ๐ท AI Overview? โ 6 firms listed. Only one tiny ๐. Click the ๐ฆ๐ต๐ผ๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ button? ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐ด๐ฒ๐: Here's a more detailed look at some of these firms: THE PEARCE LAW FIRM, P.C.Edith Pearce, […]
On April 22, 2025, Google sent an email updating Local Services Ads Additional Terms for Providers: Subject: Action required: important updates to Local Service Ads Additional Terms Many people are arguing that lawyers cannot participate in Local Services Ads, as this would constitute a per se violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct related to […]
Conrad and I recently joined Zack at Lawyerist to record a conversation about AI and marketing. You might think that we spend the whole time on how lawyers can use AI to publish content. You'd be wrong. While AI can certainly support publishing, there are many more interesting ways to use it in legal marketing. […]
As more legal services consumers turn to ChatGPT for local law firm recommendations, a fascinating intersection between AI, search, and maps unfolds. While Google remains the undisputed leader in local business data, ChatGPT is increasingly becoming an entry point for searchers seeking legal representation. But hereโs the kicker: instead of keeping users within its ecosystem, […]
When law firms contact us, they usually want to talk: โข PPC Ads โข SEO Rankings โข Lead Generation Very few want to talk: โข Brand โข Trust & Recognition โข Emotional Connection Admittedly, much of this concerns that AttorneySync is known for lead generation across those common digital channels. But even when we start […]
According to an October 2024 study by SE Ranking: "The legal niche triggers the highest percentage of AIOs (77.67%). The average number of links matched between the AI Overview resources and the top 20 search results was 6.49 for legal topics. AI Overviews for legal topics most frequently link to NYCourts.gov (114 links), YouTube.com (48 […]
I'm grateful for my friend, Charley Mann of Law firm Alchemy. If you're a lawyer, subscribe to his Free Email List. In a recent email, Charley calls out bad guru advice on hiring: "Trying to execute a major SEO improvement? You need to find people who will help you, instead of trying to DIY it […]
If youโve spent any time on LinkedIn, youโve likely seen posts from law firm SEO experts showing off charts with an โup and to the rightโ trajectory. These screenshots, often pulled from tools like Semrush or Ahrefs, are meant to signal SEO success. And itโs not just the agencies celebratingโ๐น๐ฎ๐ ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฟ๐บ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ต๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐บ […]
Meh, links! All things being equal, links still tend to move the dial more than any other factor in legal SERPs. Maybe links are having a diminishing impact internet-wide. But in my experience, quality links, especially relevant links (both topically and geographically), tend to improve law firm visibility in search more than most everything else. […]