Many major SEO publications suggest that we're on the verge of a Penguin 2.0 update. Many of us are still hoping that this is the "big one" that knocks down some of the most common link spam techniques used by lawyers across the web. While the first penguin update undoubtedly "shook things up," as evidence by the uptick in calls and requests for audits that we've received, some of the most egregious forms of spam are still working for some firms.
But the point of this post isn't to rant about how Google isn't perfect. It's to help you prepare for this, as well as, future updates.
In Penguin 2.0 Forewarning: The Google Perspective on Links Stone Temple Consulting's Eric Enge discusses what he believes Google wants a link to represent:
Links Must Be Citations
This is the core concept. Just like the professor's research paper, which lists other research papers referenced by the professor in creating their paper.
The professor only lists (links) to the other papers most relevant to and most important to to their paper. You can't buy that, and never occurred to researchers to try and do that with each other. This system was pure at its heart.
Of course, many of you will call b.s. on this. You've seen link spam work. You've seen your competitors outrank you with shoddy links. Heck, you've benefited from them yourself.
And no one doubts that crappy links have worked, and to some extent, might still work. But that's not really the issue here.
The main issue is that you're always going to find yourself at odds with Google. You're always going to be vulnerable to more sophisticated future versions of the algorithms.
Now this might not be problematic for you. Perhaps you don't heavily rely on search traffic for new business. Perhaps you don't have a problem making short-term gains in search, getting penalized and starting over on new domains. Maybe you're not really concerned about your reputation or your ethical obligations as an attorney. That's your bag.
But if you're looking to build a long-term stronghold in search, here's what Enge recommends you consider when building links:
1. Would you build the link if Google and Bing did not exist?
2. If you have 2 minutes with a customer, and the law required that you show a random sampling of your links to customer prospects, would you happily show the link to a target customer? Or would it embarrass you?
3. Did the person giving you the link intend it as a genuine endorsement?
4. Do you have to make an argument to justify that it's a good link?
Of course, some of you will say, "that's impossible! No one wants to naturally link to me."
But who's fault is that?
Doing real law firm stuff that earns real attention is hard. That's what makes it valuable. That's what drives search engines to evolve to distinguish between valuable web assets and spam.
Over the years, law firm prospects have sent us reports from just about all of our competitors. Unfortunately, even today, some law firm marketing agencies still mislead their clients via "reporting." One particularly egregious example comes in the form of ranking reports. Which prompted this LinkedIn post. To my surprise, I received a lot of […]
John Wanamaker supposedly said "Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don't know which half." In an an effort to figure out "what half is working," attribution was born. Coupled with a transition from traditional, offline ads to digital media, attribution became the holy grail for analyzing advertising spends. But […]
I recently asked ChatGPT, "What are some of the top personal injury law firms in Chicago?? Actually, first I ask "who are some of the top personal injury lawyers in Chicago?" ChatGPT couldn't handle that one, so I modified the prompt. ChatGPT listed five very well-known firms downtown. Can you guess the other four? That's […]
If you're like me, you have some degree of AI, ChatGBT, Bard, exhaustion. Now don't get me wrong, this is stuff is remarkable and is changing, well, a lot. But before you hook up the ChatGPT API to your WordPress API and crank out 10,000 pages, here are a few things to think about. Let's […]
If you know me, you know my opinions about links and SEO advice from Google. If you don't, here's the TL;DR: Meh, links! Meaning, all things being equal, links still remain a competitive difference maker for ranking. Take Google's SEO advice with several grains of salt. Google has no economic incentive to help your site […]
The best marketing advice I can give you is to be authentic. Of course, you don't find that very helpful in terms of meeting your growth goals. So, you might decide to game the system. As I'm writing this, one of the more popular ways to gain the system is to pay for engagement. This […]
The following post was written by ChatGPT. ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, is a state-of-the-art language model that can generate human-like text based on a given prompt or context. This technology has the potential to revolutionize the way that businesses, including law firms, market themselves to potential clients. One way that a law firm could use […]
How long does SEO take? When can I expect to see results? What results should I expect to see? These are all reasonable questions that we field from lawyers every day. And, like many legal answers, the answer is: It depends. Yes, I know that's not the answer you wanted. But it's the most honest […]
And how much time should they spend doing it? I recently had the privilege of chatting with Tyson, Jim, and Conrad for an upcoming episode of The Maximum Lawyer Podcast. If you're not familiar with The Maximum Lawyer community, you should definitely check it out. Jim asked a really great question about who should do […]
